Less manual monitoring
Dropout risk agent, replacing termly review
Twelvetech Systems is an AI software company. We build the applications, train the models, run the infrastructure and get you found, for organisations that have to justify the decisions their software makes.
If it informs a decision about a person, it has to be inspectable. Hover any tile to see it come alive — each one animates the kind of work it describes.
Custom models trained on your data — prediction, computer vision, LLM agents and retrieval — evaluated against a cheap baseline before anything sophisticated gets built.
Custom applications, multi-tenant SaaS, mobile and integration.
Technical audits, structured data, Core Web Vitals and publishing automation.
Pipelines, monitoring, migrations and managed care after launch.
Sensor rigs, firmware and on-device inference where the signal is unreliable.
Where a model touches a decision about a person, the explanation and the route to contest it are part of the same deliverable. Audit trails, tenant isolation and transparency portals are quoted with the build, not sold back to you afterwards.
This is a working miniature of what ClassAura does. Switch the input signals on and off and watch the network re-run: the risk score moves, and the cyan attribution pass traces the result back to whichever input actually drove it.
Turn these on and off. Every change re-runs the model in real time.
A demonstration built on the same idea as the production system, with illustrative weights rather than a live cohort.
A percentage with no context is marketing. These are improvements measured or estimated at delivery, in the setting named under each one.
Dropout risk agent, replacing termly review
Task Tracker Hub, after the interface rebuild
Asset management, procurement to disposal
Domain migration across Microsoft 365 and Moodle
Switch between them to see what each one actually shows a user. ClassAura is live with paying customers; the others range from active development to proven engines ready to build on.
Engagement intelligence for higher education
Reads the engagement signals a college already produces — attendance, participation, submissions, tutorial contact — and returns a ranked, explainable view of which learners need attention this week, with a student portal so nobody is scored in the dark.
AI marking assistant with an evidence trail
Drafts formative feedback against your own assessment criteria, and links every sentence it writes back to the passage and criterion that produced it, so a marker accepts, edits or rejects on sight rather than trusting a black box.
Sensing, on-device decisions and remote action
The monitoring platform behind our agriculture and livestock work, generalised: a sensor rig, a model that runs on the handset, and remote control of whatever needs to happen next. Built for places with poor connectivity.
Vehicle damage assessment from a photograph
Pixel-level detection of scratches and dents, returning where the damage is and what kind it is. Built for claims, fleet checks and rental handovers that currently rely on someone walking around the car with a clipboard.
Most AI projects fail before anyone writes model code, because the wrong decision was targeted or the data never supported it. Both are discoverable in the first fortnight if you look.
Before a model, the decision. Who acts on the output, how often, on what information, and what a wrong call actually costs.
What data exists, what is missing, what is biased and what cannot lawfully be used. Most projects narrow here, and that is the point.
A simple, cheap approach gets built and measured before anything sophisticated. If the baseline is good enough, we tell you and stop.
Design and engineering in reviewable increments, with the explanation built alongside the model rather than bolted on at the end.
Access control, audit logging, monitoring, accessibility, security review of every endpoint, and a defined route for a person to challenge a decision.
Into production with monitoring, drift checks and a support window. Handover means your team can operate it without calling us.
Every card carries its own generative visual. Open one for the case note: what the system does, how it was built and what it changed.
Teams-native engagement intelligence for UK higher education, in production with paying colleges.
Open case noteAn agent that surfaces at-risk learners before the risk becomes an outcome.
Open case noteA Windows assistant that runs local or hosted models and takes the repetitive edges off a working day.
Open case noteA context-aware platform that reads written input for behavioural indicators without overreaching into diagnosis.
Open case noteInstance segmentation that finds surface damage on vehicle photographs and says exactly where it is.
Open case noteAn encoder–decoder model that writes a sentence for a photograph, attending to regions as each word forms.
Open case noteEvery column on the right describes something we have watched happen to a client before they came to us. Worth asking whoever else you are talking to.
| The moment | Twelvetech | What often happens instead |
|---|---|---|
| Who answers your enquiry | One of the two founders, who will also work on the project | An account manager, then a handover to people you have not met |
| What happens in week two | A data audit that often shrinks the scope | A kick-off deck and a signed statement of work |
| When a model is the wrong answer | We say so, and the discovery fee stands | The model gets built anyway |
| Who owns the output | You do, on payment, in writing | Ambiguous, resolved in the vendor's favour |
| What handover means | Docs, tests and sessions until your team can run it | A credentials handover and a support quote |
| How you leave | Thirty days' notice, documentation written for a successor | Difficult, by design |
Attributed by role rather than name, because most of our clients are institutions with their own communications approvals.
The thing that convinced us was being told, in week two, that half of what we had asked for was not supported by the data we held. Nobody had said that before.
Our data protection officer had a list of eleven questions. They answered all of them on the first call, including the two we expected them to dodge.
It went live during term. Staff noticed the new domain and did not notice anything else, which was exactly the brief.
Technical evaluators and business decision-makers want different evidence, so each has its own path rather than one compressed page.
Three production deployments in full: the problem as the client stated it, what we did, and how the outcome landed.
For the buyerEight sectors, what we build in each, and the specific evidence behind every claim.
For the buyerStarting figures on the page, what moves the number, and three practices we have chosen against.
For the evaluatorStack, tenant isolation, audit logging, data residency and what happens to a model after launch.
For the evaluatorSix delivery phases with the deliverables you receive at the end of each one.
For everyoneSixteen questions on commercial terms, data handling, model drift, accessibility and project failure.
Tell us what you are trying to improve and what data you hold. If a model is not the right answer, we will say so before you spend anything on building one.